GRANTS PASS, Ore. — A new mobile surveillance trailer, equipped with cameras and a loudspeaker, has been deployed at one of the city’s three designated camping sites for unhoused residents. The trailer, positioned at the corner of NW 6 and A Street, directly across from City Hall, aims to monitor the area, but its presence has raised concerns among those living at the site.
The trailer, which features multiple cameras and a loudspeaker, is part of the city’s efforts to regulate its sanctioned camping locations. However, for many residents, the surveillance feels invasive and dehumanizing. Several individuals living in the approved camping area expressed discomfort with the constant monitoring, feeling as though their privacy is being compromised.
Chris Taylor, a resident who has spent the past year living in a tent at various locations around Grants Pass, shared his frustrations with NBC5 News. He described the surveillance as reminiscent of being “an animal in a zoo.” Taylor’s comments reflect a broader sentiment among those living in the designated area who feel that they are being treated without dignity.
Another former resident, identified only as Kim, spoke about her unease during a phone interview. She explained that the presence of the trailer and the rules surrounding the camping sites made her feel as though the city did not trust the residents. “It almost feels like they don’t trust us,” Kim said. “They’re treating us almost like we’re kids.”
The designated camping sites have strict rules in place, including a requirement that residents must vacate the site after four nights. While the city aims to provide a safe and organized space for unhoused individuals, the regulation of these sites has led to feelings of uncertainty and instability among those who depend on them.
For those living in the camps, the trailer’s surveillance represents not just an increase in oversight, but also a symbol of control that many feel undermines their humanity. The concerns voiced by residents highlight a broader issue: How can cities effectively support unhoused populations without infringing on their privacy and dignity?
As the debate over the use of surveillance at homeless camps continues, many are left wondering whether the city’s approach truly addresses the complex challenges faced by those experiencing homelessness, or if it only exacerbates the sense of being marginalized.